How a Flawed Dismissal Cost an Employer Over $1.5 Million - and Why Your Business Could Be Next

Sally Dillon • January 16, 2025

Introduction

Psychiatric injuries resulting from mishandled disciplinary processes are now a costly reality for Australian employers. A recent High Court ruling on 11 December 2024 has not only set a legal precedent but also highlighted the devastating financial consequences of procedural missteps.


While the legal term used in this case is "psychiatric injury," it aligns closely with what many employers commonly refer to as "psychological injury." For clarity and accessibility, these terms will be used interchangeably throughout this article.


In a landmark case, an employer faced over $1.44 million in damages for psychiatric injury following a flawed dismissal process. Compounding the issue, the same employer had previously lost an unfair dismissal claim in the Fair Work Commission, paying the employee $27,248. Adding to the financial strain, substantial legal fees were incurred defending both cases.


This article explores the case, its implications, and how businesses can safeguard themselves from similar costly outcomes.

Understanding the Full Financial Impact:

Two Claims, Two Significant Costs

The employer first lost an unfair dismissal claim in the Fair Work Commission, settling for $27,248.68. This outcome alone was a warning sign of procedural mismanagement. But the employee wasn’t done. They pursued a second legal claim in the Supreme Court of Victoria, alleging a psychiatric injury was caused by a breach of the employment contract, including the Disciplinary Procedure, which was found to be incorporated as a clause in the employee’s employment contract.


The financial ramifications didn’t stop at damages:

  • Legal Fees: Defending both claims involved substantial costs, likely amounting to hundreds of thousands of dollars.
  • Reputational Damage: Beyond the financial strain, the employer’s credibility suffered, potentially impacting future talent acquisition and employee morale.

Key Lessons for Employers


1. Procedural Missteps Are Costly

The employer's failure to provide the employee with all allegations prior to the dismissal - including claims of a "pattern of aggression" - was a central issue in both legal proceedings. Had proper steps been followed, the significant financial and reputational costs might have been avoided.


2. Legal Battles Compound Financial Risks

While the damages award of $1.44 million garnered headlines, the cumulative costs, including legal fees and the unfair dismissal settlement, paint an even grimmer picture. For employers, one mishandled process can quickly snowball into multiple legal challenges.


3. Employee Persistence Can Escalate Issues

This case demonstrates that employees are increasingly aware of their legal rights and are willing to pursue claims through multiple avenues. Employers must ensure their processes are robust enough to withstand such scrutiny.



Actionable Steps for Employers


1. Separate Policies and Procedures from your Employment Contracts

Embedding policies and procedures directly into employment contracts can create significant challenges. Once policies become part of the contract terms, updating them often requires employee agreement, creating administrative hurdles and limiting flexibility. This rigid structure not only complicates policy updates but also increases the risk of breach-of-contract claims if the procedures are not followed to the letter, as demonstrated in the High Court case.


Instead, reference policies as standalone documents separate from the employment contract. This approach allows employers to review and update policies as needed without requiring employee consent, ensuring they remain adaptable and aligned with evolving business needs. It also reduces the legal risks associated with inadvertent breaches, providing a safer framework for both employers and employees.


2. Strengthen Policies and Procedures

Ensure your disciplinary policies and procedures are clear but allow room for some discretion and consideration on a case by case basis. Overly rigid policies can lead to breaches if they are not followed. 


3. Train Your Leadership Teams

Equip leadership teams with comprehensive training that covers both procedural fairness and the importance of employee mental health. Ensure they understand how to communicate effectively, manage disciplinary processes with empathy, and adhere to legal and organisational policies. Training should also highlight the potential mental health impacts of disciplinary actions, encouraging managers to approach these situations with sensitivity and a focus on support.


By balancing fairness with compassion, leadership teams can foster trust, minimise conflict, and reduce the risk of legal and reputational consequences.


4. Conduct Comprehensive Investigations

When handling allegations:

  • Share all relevant claims with the employee.
  • Allow sufficient time for them to respond.
  • Base decisions solely on evidence presented during the process.


5. Account for Mental Health

Be mindful of the psychological impact disciplinary actions can have on employees. Approach these processes with compassion and respect, recognising that employment decisions can significantly affect a person's well-being. Demonstrating care through open communication, fairness, and support can help alleviate distress.


Offering resources like counselling services or an Employee Assistance Program (EAP) provides employees with avenues to address mental health concerns, showing your commitment to their overall well-being. By prioritising respect and support, you can not only reduce the risk of claims but also create a workplace culture rooted in trust and empathy.


6. Seek Specialist Advice Early

Engaging an experienced HR Consultant or Legal Adviser before and during disciplinary processes can help employers identify and mitigate risks before they escalate into costly disputes.


Conclusion: Lessons from a Landmark Case


This case serves as a stark reminder of the importance of procedural fairness and being mindful of employees' mental health during disciplinary processes. Beyond the $1.44 million damages award, the employer faced additional costs from an unfair dismissal claim and substantial legal fees, illustrating how quickly financial consequences can spiral.


Employers must prioritise clear policies, robust training, and fair procedures to protect themselves from similar outcomes. By focusing on fair processes and mental health considerations, employers can reduce legal risks, promote a more supportive workplace, and demonstrate genuine care for their employees' well-being.


FAQ's


Can an employee pursue multiple claims for the same dismissal?

Yes. This case highlights how an employee can first lodge an unfair dismissal claim and later pursue additional legal action, such as a psychological/psychiatric injury claim.


Are legal fees recoverable if the employer wins a case?

In most cases, each party bears its own legal costs. Employers should budget for significant legal expenses when defending claims.


How can employers prevent psychological/psychiatric injury claims?

Employers can mitigate the risk of psychological or psychiatric injury claims by ensuring procedural fairness, providing mental health support, and fostering a culture of respect and compassion during disciplinary processes.


To achieve this, equip leadership teams with training that focuses on communication, empathy, and the principles of procedural fairness. Ensure they understand how their decisions can impact employees’ mental health and the importance of handling each case with care.


Additionally, avoid embedding rigidly binding policies into employment contracts. This flexibility allows employers to adapt to individual circumstances without risking contractual breaches. By implementing these practices, employers can minimise legal risks while creating a fair, supportive, and trusting workplace environment.

What role does mental health play in these cases?

Mental health plays a significant role in cases involving disciplinary processes. Psychological or psychiatric injuries are increasingly recognised as foreseeable consequences of employment decisions, particularly when procedural fairness is lacking or the process is handled insensitively.



Disciplinary actions can affect an employee’s sense of security, self-esteem, and overall well-being. Employers who fail to consider these impacts may inadvertently contribute to mental health issues, increasing the risk of claims. By integrating compassion, fairness, and mental health support into workplace policies and processes, employers can help safeguard employees’ well-being and reduce the likelihood of such outcomes.

Is $1.44 million a typical damages award?

While this amount is exceptional, it signals the High Court’s willingness to award significant damages where breaches result in severe consequences.



Need more help?

Worried about your disciplinary policies (or lack of) or need some training for your managers? Reach out today for a consultation, and we’ll help you stay on track with expert advice tailored to your business.

  • Click here  to book a FREE 30 minute consultation to discuss your HR/WHS challenges.
  • Click here  to book a Business Health Check to review your policies, procedures and frameworks.
  • Click here  to join our mailing list to get more tips, advice and updates on all things HR, WHS and Leadership.
By Sally Dillon October 4, 2024
Introduction
By Sally Dillon September 18, 2024
Introduction
By Sally Dillon September 16, 2024
Introduction
By Sally Dillon July 4, 2024
Is The Monkey Still Relevant? In the world of modern management, the concept of "Management Time: Who’s Got the Monkey?" by William Oncken Jr. and Donald L. Wass still resonates deeply. Originally published in 1974 and revisited multiple times, this seminal article sheds light on a perennial issue: managers overwhelmed by tasks while subordinates seem to have ample time and energy. Understanding Management Time Today Managers today face a quartet of time demands: Boss-imposed time: Tasks directly mandated by superiors, non-negotiable and swiftly penalised if neglected. System-imposed time: Requests from peers for support, vital for organisational harmony and efficiency. Self-imposed time: Initiatives and tasks originating from the manager themselves, including tasks delegated by subordinates. Team member-imposed time: Requests, questions, or tasks initiated by team members that require the manager's attention or input. The challenge lies in balancing these demands to maximise discretionary time—time not governed by external pressures and crucial for strategic decision-making. The Monkey Metaphor in Today’s Workplace Imagine a manager walking down the hallway, stopped by a subordinate with an urgent issue. Initially, the problem is the subordinate's ("the monkey is on their back"). However, as the manager engages without immediately resolving, the monkey leaps to the manager's back. This shift represents how subordinates can inadvertently burden managers with their tasks and decisions. Practical Leadership Takeaways Empowerment through Initiative: Managers should foster a culture where subordinates take initiative and responsibility. This not only lightens the manager’s load but also enhances team autonomy and morale. Clear Communication: Setting clear boundaries and expectations prevents monkeys from leaping onto the manager's back. Discussions should clarify who owns the next steps and when they should be completed. Time Management: Effective time management is not just about personal efficiency but about strategically using discretionary time to focus on high-impact tasks and strategic priorities. Implementing Modern Strategies Today's managers must proactively manage their time and responsibilities: Appointment-Based Support: Engage with subordinates by appointment rather than ad-hoc interruptions to manage tasks effectively. Documentation and Follow-Up: Use technology and structured communication tools to document tasks and progress, ensuring clarity and accountability without burdening the manager. Training and Empowerment: Invest in training programs that empower subordinates to handle tasks independently and make informed decisions. Conclusion The timeless lesson from "Management Time: Who’s Got the Monkey?" remains clear: managers must reclaim control over their time by preventing subordinate tasks from becoming their own. By fostering initiative, setting clear boundaries, and leveraging technology, modern leaders can achieve greater efficiency and effectiveness in their roles. This approach not only reduces stress but also enhances organisational productivity and employee satisfaction—a win-win for managers navigating today’s complex business environments. You can read the original HBR Article here. Further Enhance Your Leadership Skills If you find yourself grappling with the challenges of balancing managerial responsibilities and empowering your team effectively, consider exploring our Leadership Dynamics Program at Revolution Consulting Group. Designed to equip leaders with modern strategies and practical tools, our program focuses on fostering a culture of accountability, enhancing team dynamics, and maximising leadership potential. Whether you're looking to refine your leadership approach or empower your team to take on greater responsibilities, our tailored coaching and training solutions can support your journey towards becoming a more effective and influential leader. Click here to book an free Triage Call to find out about how our 12 week Leadership Dynamics Program can benefit you. Click here to join our mailing list to get more tips, advice and updates on all things HR and Leadership.
DISC Profiling
By Sally Dillon March 27, 2024
Discover the transformative power of DISC profiling in this essential guide for business leaders and aspiring managers. Dive into the benefits and implementation strategies to elevate your team dynamics today.
By Sally Dillon March 26, 2024
Maximise Your Business Success With A Comprehensive HR Health Check
More Posts

READY TO GET THINGS DONE?

Revolution Consulting Group is your Dedicated HR Partner

Share by: